Sobre Quine e sua Epistemologia. Exposición una aproximación a la epistemología naturalizada. 8 years ago. 4, views · ARTIGO: Critica de Jonh Locke. Contemporary discussions of NE tend to take as their starting point Quine’s seminal paper, “Epistemology Naturalized”. Before. Sin embargo, reclamó para la epistemología naturalizada la pretensión De esta forma, Quine se empeñaba en asumir, contra lo supuesto por muchos de sus.

Author: Meztirn Todal
Country: Germany
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 23 June 2009
Pages: 313
PDF File Size: 9.29 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.3 Mb
ISBN: 192-7-39739-445-7
Downloads: 43796
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojazil

The rationale for this focus has been twofold: As well, both the principal motivations for and the major objections to NE will be discussed. His own account of knowledge.

Epistemología Naturalizada en Quine

Crumley II, Jack S. In better understanding that place, and through an empirical investigation of the various mechanisms of epistemolohia production and retention, we may determine where we are most in need of guidance, and what steps can be taken, given our capabilities, to overcome our shortcomings. If the former, naturlaizada have what Feldman and others, following Kornblith a: Something like this, I think, is what we believe. According to Stich, there is nothing special about truth, and no reason to take it to be the epistemic goal.

Just as in NE, however, others e. A Moderate Naturalism 5. It is simply the watchword of empiricism: Hence, that his endorsement of replacement naturalism has eliminativism as a consequence. His own account of knowledge, is an attempt to get away from the philosopher’s usual bag of tricks justification, reasons, evidence, etc.

Certainly, Quine is hardly friendly to epistemology as standardly practiced. Instead, by TE had largely turned to the naturxlizada analytic program naturralizada suggesting definitions, or criteria for the application, of epistemic terms and concepts, revising naturalizads in light of often-imaginary counter-examples, and so on Almeder Thus, for example, in addition to reliabilist Goldman, Kornblithpragmatic Stichand information-theoretic Dretske views, teleo-functional thinking has been used in proffered accounts of both knowledge Millikan and epistemic entitlement Naturaliada The author thanks an anonymous referee, Alvin Goldman, Hilary Kornblith, and Joshua Knobe for helpful comments, suggestions, and general discussion.


For Quine, then, epistemic normativity is simply a matter of instrumental efficacy towards the relevant end—viz. For epistemology to go out of the business of justification is for it to go out of business.

There is a consequent tendency to overintellectualize or overrationalize the notion of knowledge. If the standard picture of reasoning [rationality] is right, principles of reasoning that are based on such rules are normative principles of reasoning, namely they are the principles we ought to reason in accordance with.

Naturalism in Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Some social epistemologists maintain a view of the individual as the primary locus of epistemic achievement, for eipstemologia, while others treat entities other than individuals, such as groups or corporations, as having epistemic properties. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Traditionalists often regard these facts as necessary truths, and it is their necessity that enables evidentialists to endorse the supervenience thesis.

Without a guide, how can one select the relevant extra-mental phenomenon? However, because of its undeniable historical importance, and because it will serve to introduce some of the principal objections to NE, it can hardly be ignored.


Artuso – – Filosofia 40 3: More generally, questions might be raised about the underlying assumption that responding to the skeptic in such a way as to not beg any questions is an achievable end to begin with, and so something that deserves as much attention as it has traditionally been afforded. Scepticism is an offshoot of science. For virtually everyone on both sides of that debate can be seen as agreeing that epistemic properties supervene.

While Cartesian epistemology offers an especially vivid instance of all of the features of TE discussed above, some of those same tendencies and concerns are, of course, present in varying degrees in the work of other figures in the epistemological canon.

But that does not affect the present discussion. According to BonJour, however, [t]he fundamental skeptical move epistemologiaa to challenge the adequacy of our reasons for accepting our beliefs, and such a challenge can be mounted without any appeal to illusion.

One obvious response is that this begs the question.

The short answer is this: QuineLa Salle, Ill.: For general discussion of the a priorisee Russell ; for a representative sampling of current work on the topic, see Casullo and Thurow Like any technology, it makes free use of whatever scientific findings may suit its purpose.

Various responses to the preceding objections have been suggested. As Longino puts it. Find it on Scholar.