El efecto Lucifer has ratings and reviews. El renombrado psicólogo social Philip Zimbardo tiene el cómo –y la multitud de porqués– de nuestra. El efecto Lucifer has 2 ratings and 0 reviews: Published by Paidós, Paperback. The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil is a book which includes professor Philip Zimbardo’s first detailed, . En suma, aún cuando El Efecto Lucifer está escrito en inglés, su lenguaje sencillo y coloquial facilita su.

Author: Brakazahn Kazrajind
Country: Iraq
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 24 November 2015
Pages: 436
PDF File Size: 7.97 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.97 Mb
ISBN: 603-1-86177-465-2
Downloads: 84522
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Daigor

Why do some people cut up dead bodies and eat them??????? Vicente Mulero Carbonell rated it ohilip liked it Oct 14, He goes to great lengths to convince the reader of the brilliance of every move and thought.

Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Retrieved December 3, Berkeley — Department of Psychology. The New York Times. April Learn how and when to remove this template message.

Archived from the original ximbardo January 11, The book includes over 30 years of subsequent research into the psychological and social factors which result in immoral acts being committed by otherwise moral people.

Society for General Psychology. I remember this study when I was first going to College back in the early 90s.

The Lucifer Effect – Wikipedia

Es mejor ver el documental del Experimento. The prisoner was eventually released after screaming and acting unstable in front of the other inmates.

Yes situations can change a lot in us and can even make us act in ways we never thought we would, especially strenuous ones, but my brain simply refuses to believe that a situation alone can turn a “good” person into an “evil” one. It is such a a chore to even skim through it! The New York Times.

Archived from the original on October 8, Three-quarters of the book describes in excruciating detail! Examples include the events that occurred at the Abu Ghraib Detention Centerin which the defense team—including Gary Myers —argued that it was not the prison guards and interrogators that were at fault for the physical and mental abuse of detainees but the Bush administration policies themselves. At the end, the author take the opposing perspective of finding heroic and good in people, but strangely calls his own wife a hero for proposing an early stop to the Stanford Prison Experiment 30 years prior.


So, it is Zimbardo’s complete and despicable reporting of a case that quite frankly to me demonstrates how far he would take something and disregard the welfare of others. Stanford Prison Experiment – Spotlight at Stanford. Early in life he experienced discrimination and prejudice, growing up poor on welfare and being Italian.

The “social conditions” he discusses are “depersonalization” and “authority” then lists the result of those two things ad nauseum, but there isn’t any real insight, just a rehashing of the “results”- no insight into the cause; The Stamford prison experiment, genocide in Rowanda, Abu Ghraib, Nazi’s.

In the prison-conscious autumn ofwhen George Jackson was killed at San Quentin and Attica erupted in even more deadly rebellion and retribution, the Stanford Prison Experiment made news in a big way. In later interviews, several guards told interviewers that they knew what Zimbardo wanted to have happen, and they did their best to make that happen.

At the end of the experiment, after all the prisoners had been released and the guards let go, everyone was brought back into the same room for evaluation and to be able to get their feelings out in the open towards one another.

Books by Philip G. I make a point of always finishing a book once I’ve started it. I actually had to put it down for a little while because I was efceto frustrated with his reckless regard to proper reporting of how a study actually should take place.

At the end, the author take the opposing perspective of finding heroic and good in people, but strangely calls his own wife a hero for proposing an early stop to the Stanford Prison Experim Lots of efecyo and started off well with high promises of evaluating some of the atrocities that occurred and investigating the sources of evil.

Archived from the original on October 19, Yes situations can change a lot in us a I hated this book zimbatdo all levels. SIS is a new term coined to describe and normalize the effects military culture has on the socialization of both active soldiers and veterans.

Want to Read Currently Reading Read.

El efecto Lucifer

The judge apparently disregarded Zimbardo’s testimony, and gave Frederick the maximum 8-year sentence. Our situations do not make us evil. Had it been normal sized font it would have been the size of a suitcase. He describes the experiment in excruciating detail in the first third of the book. But for all that I couldn’t get past the tedious writing.


The title takes its name from the biblical story of the favored angel of God, Luciferhis fall from graceand his assumption of the role of Satanthe embodiment of evil. It wasn’t until his then girlfriend, and later wife, told him how horrible it was that he was allowing this to continue to these young boys phliip then he stopped the experiment. A new time-based metaphor therapy for PTSD”. The zimbarod chapter is on the book’s title theme of Lucifer and on the nature of moral transformation as an outcome of the interplay between individual dispositionsituationand systems of power.

It reads …more De-individualism and anononimity as driving explanations for bad behaviour! I can’t even give this efectto 2 stars for the important observations regarding human nature because I was so bored and fed up by the last chapter.

El efecto Lucifer by Philip Zimbardo

Over dreadful pages! Zimbardo wrote the foreword to the second edition of Shirran’s book on the subject. Occasionally, disputes between prisoner and guards got out of hand, violating an explicit injunction against physical force that both prisoners and guards had read prior to enrolling in the study.

David Spiegel, professor of psychiatry at the Stanford University School of Medicinecalled Zimbardo “a legendary teacher”, saying that “he has changed the way we think about social influences. I absolutely hated this book. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Zimbardo himself took part in the experiment, playing the role of “prison superintendent” who phklip mediate disputes between guards and prisoners.

Philip Zimbardo

This story was so disturbing. Chapter 10 presents the data gathered in the SPE, and Chapter 11 is an examination of the ethical questions raised about the experiment. I thought the experiment was mundane, and that Zimbardo is really overestimating the results of this 6 zimbagdo experiment.